RSCH FPX 7860 Assessment 1 Literature Review Research: How to Write It

This manual is for RSCH FPX 7860 Assessment 1, start to submission. Literature Review Research asks you to analyze a set of peer-reviewed studies on a topic in your field, usually in a matrix: for each study, the main concepts, the research questions or hypotheses, the theoretical framework, the population and sample, the research method and design, and a summary of findings. The grade turns on accurate extraction. Each cell must reflect what the study actually did, in your own words, so the matrix can support a later literature review. Below is the method our tutors use, a structure that maps to the criteria, and an annotated sample excerpt. Prefer to hand it off? A premium original sample for this exact assessment comes back in 24 to 48 hours, revised free until it meets the guide. Capella's catalog lists the course as RSCH-FPX7860, and some courserooms print RSCH7860; both point to this same Assessment 1. In current courserooms this assessment typically appears as "Literature Review Research".

One honesty note before the manual: Capella revises courses and scoring guides over time, so always write to the exact scoring guide attached to your assessment in the courseroom. The course identity above is verified on capella.edu; the method and structure below are our tutors' approach to it, not Capella's official rubric text.

RSCH FPX 7860 Assessment 1 grading scale at Capella FlexPath, the criterion levels this assessment is scored on, from Capella Tutors
How Capella FlexPath grades RSCH FPX 7860 Assessment 1, visualized by Capella Tutors.

How RSCH FPX 7860 Assessment 1 is scored

FlexPath does not use letter grades. Each criterion in the scoring guide lands on one of four levels, and the level descriptions are the real writing brief:

LevelWhat it means on a literature review matrix
DistinguishedThe literature review matrix is specific to the organization or case, applies course concepts accurately with credible sources, and ends in justified conclusions or recommendations.
ProficientThe literature review matrix is accurate, but the application or recommendations are general.
BasicThe literature review matrix describes concepts with little application.
Non-performanceA required part of the literature review matrix is missing.

Use the template and the number of studies your courseroom specifies.

The RSCH FPX 7860 Assessment 1 method, step by step

  1. Choose studies

    Peer-reviewed, recent and on one topic.

  2. Identify concepts

    Key variables or ideas.

  3. Record questions or hypotheses

    As the authors state them.

  4. Name the framework

    The theory the study uses.

  5. Record population, sample and design

    Who, how many and how.

  6. Summarize findings

    Main results in your own words.

A structure that maps to the criteria

The matrix template in your courseroom sets the fields; complete each for every study.

SectionWhat it must doGuide
Study 1 entriesAll matrix fields.matrix row
Study 2 entriesAll matrix fields.matrix row
Study 3 and further entriesAll matrix fields.matrix rows
ReferencesCurrent APA.as needed

Annotated sample excerpt

An original model excerpt from our team, written to show the register that reaches the top of the guide. Learn the moves, then write your own version.

Sample excerpt: one matrix entry Original model by Capella Tutors

Research method and design: a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design using validated scales for burnout and intention to leave.1 Population and sample: 412 registered nurses from six hospitals in one state, recruited through professional association email lists, a convenience sample the authors note may overrepresent engaged nurses.2 Summary of findings: higher burnout predicted stronger intention to leave, and supportive supervision weakened that relationship.3

  • 1Records design precisely.
  • 2Records sample with its limitation.
  • 3Summarizes findings accurately.

The full premium sample for your exact assessment, written fresh to your scoring guide and topic, is free to request. Study it, revise it into your own voice, and submit work you understand.

Get the full sample free

The five mistakes that cost Distinguished

  • Definitions without application. Apply each concept to the organization or case.
  • No sources. Cite credible business sources.
  • Vague recommendations. Make them specific and justified.
  • Copying abstracts. Use your own words.

Pre-submission checklist

  • Studies chosen
  • Concepts
  • Questions or hypotheses
  • Frameworks
  • Population, sample and design
  • Findings and references

Want the literature review matrix written?

Send the scoring guide and any materials from your courseroom. Our team returns a premium original literature review matrix in 24 to 48 hours, revised free until it meets the guide.

Keep going

Online now