PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 CRAAP Test and Library Worksheet: How to Write It

This manual is for PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2, start to submission. The CRAAP Test and Library Worksheet asks you to practice evaluating information: apply the CRAAP test, currency, relevance, authority, accuracy and purpose, to a source found on the internet, then search the Capella library for a scholarly source on the same topic and evaluate it, explaining which is more credible and why. The grade turns on applying each CRAAP criterion with evidence from the source. "It seems reliable" scores low; naming the author's credentials and the evidence cited scores high. Below is the method our tutors use, a structure that maps to the criteria, and an annotated sample excerpt. Prefer to hand it off? A premium original sample for this exact assessment comes back in 24 to 48 hours, revised free until it meets the guide. Capella's catalog lists the course as PSYC-FPX2002, and some courserooms print PSYC2002; both point to this same Assessment 2. In current courserooms this assessment typically appears as "CRAAP Test and Library Worksheet".

One honesty note before the manual: Capella revises courses and scoring guides over time, so always write to the exact scoring guide attached to your assessment in the courseroom. The course identity above is verified on capella.edu; the method and structure below are our tutors' approach to it, not Capella's official rubric text.

PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 grading scale at Capella FlexPath, the criterion levels this assessment is scored on, from Capella Tutors
How Capella FlexPath grades PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2, visualized by Capella Tutors.

How PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 is scored

FlexPath does not use letter grades. Each criterion in the scoring guide lands on one of four levels, and the level descriptions are the real writing brief:

LevelWhat it means on a worksheet
DistinguishedThe worksheet is specific to the organization or case, applies course concepts accurately with credible sources, and ends in justified conclusions or recommendations.
ProficientThe worksheet is accurate, but the application or recommendations are general.
BasicThe worksheet describes concepts with little application.
Non-performanceA required part of the worksheet is missing.

Complete every part of the worksheet and include links or citations for both sources.

The PSYC FPX 2002 Assessment 2 method, step by step

  1. Choose an internet source

    On a psychology topic.

  2. Apply currency

    Publication and update dates.

  3. Apply relevance

    Fit to your question and audience.

  4. Apply authority

    Author and publisher credentials.

  5. Apply accuracy and purpose

    Evidence cited and intent.

  6. Find a library source

    Evaluate it and compare.

A structure that maps to the criteria

The worksheet in your courseroom sets the parts; answer each in full sentences with sources where asked.

SectionWhat it must doGuide
Part 1: internet source and CRAAP testEvaluation.worksheet
Part 2: library sourceSearch and evaluation.worksheet
Comparison and referencesWhich is more credible.worksheet

Annotated sample excerpt

An original model excerpt from our team, written to show the register that reaches the top of the guide. Learn the moves, then write your own version.

Sample response: authority and accuracy Original model by Capella Tutors

Authority: the article was written by a staff writer with no stated psychology training and published on a wellness site that sells supplements, so its authority is weak.1 Accuracy: it cites one study but does not link it, and the claim that the study "proves" mindfulness cures anxiety overstates what a single small study can show.2 By contrast, the library source is a peer-reviewed meta-analysis by university researchers, so it scores far higher on both criteria.3

  • 1Evaluates authority with evidence.
  • 2Evaluates accuracy precisely.
  • 3Compares with the scholarly source.

The full premium sample for your exact assessment, written fresh to your scoring guide and topic, is free to request. Study it, revise it into your own voice, and submit work you understand.

Get the full sample free

The five mistakes that cost Distinguished

  • Definitions without application. Apply each concept to the organization or case.
  • No sources. Cite credible business sources.
  • Vague recommendations. Make them specific and justified.
  • Vague judgments. Support each criterion with evidence.

Pre-submission checklist

  • Internet source
  • All five CRAAP criteria
  • Library search
  • Scholarly source evaluated
  • Comparison
  • Citations

Want the worksheet written?

Send the scoring guide and any materials from your courseroom. Our team returns a premium original worksheet in 24 to 48 hours, revised free until it meets the guide.

Keep going

Online now